Are Yield Differences Driving Farm Profitability? Evidence from Rice Varieties Released by Kerala Agricultural University, India

Hena Maria Antony *

Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, 695522, India.

F. Thasnimol

Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, 695522, India.

Anil Kuruvila

Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, 695522, India.

Aswathy Vijayan

Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, 695522, India.

T. Paul Lazarus

Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, 695522, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Background: Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a staple crop vital for global food security, with India contributing significantly to its production; however, rice cultivation in Kerala has declined due to structural challenges. Enhancing productivity through improved varieties and evaluating their performance is essential to strengthen farm income and sustainability.

Aims: To examine the yield and income differences among selected rice varieties-Uma, Kanchana, Jyothi, and Manuratna-released by Kerala Agricultural University (KAU).

Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted in the districts of Palakkad, Alappuzha, and Malappuram in Kerala, India, during the 2024-2025 agricultural year.

Methodology: Primary data were collected from 180 rice farmers selected through a multistage sampling design. Yield gaps were estimated as the difference between research station potential yields and farm-level actual yields. The cost of cultivation was estimated using the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) cost concepts (Cost A₁, A₂, B1, B₂, and C). Economic returns were assessed in terms of gross returns, farm business income, family labour income, net income, and the benefit-cost ratio (BCR).

Results: Uma recorded the highest average yield (56.3 q ha-¹), followed by Kanchana (48.2 q ha-¹), Jyothi (45.8 q ha-¹), and Manuratna (35.2 q ha-¹). Yield gaps ranged from 22.8 q ha-¹ for Uma to 34.0 q ha-¹ for Manuratna. In terms of economic performance, Uma recorded the highest gross returns (Rs 1,63,109 ha-¹) and net income (Rs 31,769 ha-¹), with a BC ratio of 1.24, whereas Manuratna recorded a negative net income (Rs −12,039 ha⁻¹) and a BC ratio of 0.89.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that the productivity of the variety plays a key role in determining farm income under the prevailing cost-price conditions. The presence of substantial yield gaps across all varieties highlights the need for improved agronomic practices and targeted extension interventions to enhance farm-level productivity. Promoting high-yielding varieties, along with improved input management and strengthened extension services, can enhance farm profitability and reduce yield gaps.

Keywords: KAU rice varieties, cost of cultivation, CACP cost concepts, farm profitability, net income, benefit-cost ratio, yield gap


How to Cite

Antony, Hena Maria, F. Thasnimol, Anil Kuruvila, Aswathy Vijayan, and T. Paul Lazarus. 2026. “Are Yield Differences Driving Farm Profitability? Evidence from Rice Varieties Released by Kerala Agricultural University, India”. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture 19 (2):220-26. https://doi.org/10.9734/arja/2026/v19i2844.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.